Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Spratling v. Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility
as 3:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Spratling
Defendant:
Roger D. Wilson Detention Facility, Officer Anderson, Sgt Kidds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Madison County, TN et al
as 2:2022cv02508
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Howell
Defendant:
Madison County, TN, Anna Cruz, John Mehr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peoples v. Spangler
as 3:2021mc00007
Plaintiff:
Larry Peoples
Defendant:
Tom Spangler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amble et al v. Spangler et al
as 3:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
curtis lane, alonzo hoskins, robert thomas and others
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, Knox County, TN, Bernie Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNutt v. Centurion Medical et al
as 2:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee McNutt
Defendant:
Centurion Medical , Corizon Medical, Georgia Crowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2017cv02137
Plaintiff:
Willie Tolbert
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Nattely Voss, Denise Clenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannan v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Hannan
Defendant:
Tom Smith, Carter County Jail and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Mathis et al (JRG2)
as 2:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Steven M Taylor
Defendant:
Chris Mathis, C/O Buckles, Tom Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutting v. Mathis et al
as 2:2014cv00262
Plaintiff:
Oscar Ray Cutting
Defendant:
Chris Mathis, Tom Smith, Ron Street and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Russell et al
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Gary Hammonds
Defendant:
Chris Russell, Amber Carter, Tom Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
