Prison Condition Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Martinez-Hernandez v. Adducci et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv10966
Defendant: Detroit Field Office Rebecca Adducci, Chad Wolf, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff: Alejandro Martinez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BERGAL v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00319
Plaintiff: GOKHAN BERGAL
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAZARIY v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00317
Plaintiff: KMET NAZARIY
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALDRON v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00320
Plaintiff: WENDELL WALDRON
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALEH v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00313
Plaintiff: MAHMOUD SALEH
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOUD v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00318
Plaintiff: HASSAN HAMMOUD
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00316
Plaintiff: WILLY R. PEREZ
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTILLO v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00315
Plaintiff: OTTO P. PORTILLO
Defendant: CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cai v. U.S Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2014cv00554
Plaintiff: DONG CAI
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTION INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cai v. U.S Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2013cv08345
Plaintiff: Dong Cai
Defendant: U.S Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Monmouth County Correction Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?