Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Kerstein et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Gary Kerstein, Tracy Bennett, Emma C Hatchett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bennett et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Tracy Bennett, Gary Kerstine, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Benny Magnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bennett et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Tracy Bennett, Gary Kerstin, G Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Seratt et al
as 5:2022cv05015
Plaintiff:
Cora Lee Pitts
Defendant:
Officer H. Seratt, Officer McKutz, Officer F. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. John Does
as 5:2022cv05014
Plaintiff:
Cora Lee Pitts
Defendant:
John Does 1 & 2, John Doe 1, Chief of Police John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Pitts et al
as 1:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Samuel Pitts and William Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
