Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Hamm v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 9:2021cv03084
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health, John Magill, Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
San Miguel v. Abbott et al
as 1:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant:
Wellpath Recovery Solutions, Jessica Marsh, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorch v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2021cv00368
Defendant:
Rick Sloan, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, Jon P. Carner and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lorch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00354
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Preston
Defendant:
United States of America, Orange County Judicial Circuit, Wellpath Recovery Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Porfert et al
as 2:2021cv00168
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, Jon P. Carner and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Correct Care Recovery, Emily Salema and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Sawyer et al
as 3:2021cv00193
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Correct Care Recovery, Emily Salema and others
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman and Lavon Lee Boatman
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, D. Riddle, Melinda Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burr v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00883
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, FNU Riddle and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Dewayne Burr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00759
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, Wellpath Recovery Solutions, FNU Riddle and others
Plaintiff:
Robby Leon Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
