Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Mendez v. Unknown Correctional Officer et al
as 0:2014cv04528
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant:
Mr. Gilk, Calvin Wedington, Other Unknown at FMC Rochester, Minn. et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akins v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00525
Plaintiff:
Francisco Akins
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Robert Shearing, Dr. Fuentes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Pardieck et al
as 1:2014cv01160
Plaintiff:
Terry Gill
Defendant:
Shawn Pardieck, IDOC Prisoner Review Board and Unknown Others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingrassia v. Schafer et al
as 4:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Mark Stringer, Felix Vincenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 4:2013cv02464
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sydney Wallace, James F. Kanatzar, Jeffrey Gedbaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Javois et al
as 4:2013cv02421
Plaintiff:
George W. Fisher, Jr.
Defendant:
Laurent D. Javois, Felix T. Vincenz and Unknown Selvadural
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego v. Hankins et al
as 3:2013cv03154
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, Sandra Simpson, Forrest Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunderson v. Pharls et al
as 1:2013cv03792
Plaintiff:
Sean Gunderson
Defendant:
Jeff Pharls, Elgin Mental Health Center (EMHC), Paul Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Capello v. Sziebert et al
as 3:2013cv05275
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Capello
Defendant:
Leslie Sziebert , Galina Dixon, Kelly Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckel v. Jumper et al
as 3:2013cv03075
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Cody Bond, Gerald Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
