Cases 1 - 10 of 22
David Mackel v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 23-2866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. MACKEL
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAN JUMPER, PAULA LODGE, HEATHER HYMES and others
Meranelli v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric M. Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, State Operated Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doranti v. Kniesel et al
as 0:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Terry Kniesel, Ann Linkert, Cory Vargason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Harpsted et al
as 0:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Defendant:
Jodi Harpsted, Members Unknown, Ann Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prouty v. Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv02438
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
Nancy Johnson, Jodi Harpstead, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jessica Joyal, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jeremy Wouri, Sue Swansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Joyal et al
as 0:2021cv01847
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
D.H.S.-M.S.O.P, DHS-MSOP employees, Brooke Ness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Caraway et al
as 4:2020cv04080
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Tammy Teel, Cassandra Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
