Drug Related Seizure of Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
United States of America v. 1241 Douglas Avenue, Medford OR
as 3:2012cv02299
Defendant: 1241 Douglas Avenue, Medford OR
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. 19740 State Highway 42, Camas Valley, Douglas County, State and District of Oregon
as 3:2012cv01998
Defendant: 19740 State Highway 42, Camas Valley, Douglas County, State and District of Oregon
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States v. Violet Goodwin
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $85,120.00 in United States currency seized from safe deposit box number 29 at Pinnacle Bank on December 18, 2009 and others
Claimant: Shannon E. Williams
Interested Party - Appellant: Violet Goodwin
United States v. Shannon William We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1949
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $85,120.00 in United States currency seized from safe deposit box number 29 at Pinnacle Bank on December 18, 2009 and others
Claimant - Appellant: Shannon E. Williams
Interested Party: Violet Goodwin
United States v. Shannon William We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1941
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $85,120.00 in United States currency seized from safe deposit box number 29 at Pinnacle Bank on December 18, 2009 and others
Claimant - Appellant: Shannon E. Williams
Interested Party: Violet Goodwin
United States of America v. $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv00372
Defendant: $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $1,445.00 in United States currency delivered to Terry Haddock by Deshawn Hernandez on May 27, 2009 and on July 6, 2009 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Artis et al v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01091
Movant: Taylor Artis and Edward Douglas, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Patterson v. United States of America
as 3:2010cv01299
Petitioner: Douglas Patterson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture of certain motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts
United States of America v. Miscellaneous Assets of Douglas Bouchey
as 2:2009cv01002
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Miscellaneous Assets of Douglas Bouchey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Contents of Boeing Wichita Credit Union account # 1277274 et al
as 6:2008cv01176
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Contents of Boeing Wichita Credit Union account # 1277274, Contents of Boeing Wichita Credit Union account # 60533356, Contents of Intrust Bank account # 0041553950 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?