Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $81,000.00 in United States Currency
as 6:2019cv01221
Defendant:
$81,000.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Kewone Watson-Beasley
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property which is physically located at 100 Stacy Farm Road in Nebo, North Carolina et al
as 3:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
100 Stacy Farm Rd., Nebo, NC and 170 and 179 Watson Rd., Nebo, NC
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 100 Stacy Farm Rd., Nebo, NC et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
100 Stacy Farm Rd., Nebo, NC and 170 and 179 Watson Rd., Nebo, NC
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
USA, et al v. One Palmetto State Armory PA 1, et al
as 15-2859
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN S. WATSON, Individually and as Trustee of the Watson Family Gun Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE PALMETTO STATE ARMORY PA 15 MACHINEGUN RECEIVER/FRAME UNKNOWN CALIBER SERIAL NUMBER LW001804, WATSON FAMILY GUN TRUST, Claimant, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
NABULSI v. GONZALEZ et al
as 4:2007cv00348
Plaintiff:
MERVAT AHMAD NABULSI
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALEZ, ROBERT S MULLER, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. $9,970.00 in United States Currency
as 3:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
$9,970.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Ervin Lee Watson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Property Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
