Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Moses et al v. Griffin Industries, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01200
Plaintiff:
Raven Moses , Staraisha Morris , Dwayne Dale and others
Defendant:
Griffin Industries, LLC, Griffin Security Services, Winston Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Smith v. The Bulldog Lowertown, Inc.
as 0:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
The Bulldog Lowertown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Meghan Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05644
Plaintiff:
Meghan Aguilar, Teddy Amstone, Sang An and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Smith v. Sprint/United Management Company
as 3:2014cv02642
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Sprint/United Management Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Doyle et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2014cv02831
Plaintiff:
Aidan Doyle and Michael Smith
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Smith v. Sprint/United Management Company
as 2:2014at00136
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Sprint/United Management Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Sprint/United Management Company
as 2:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Sprint/United Management Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Smith et al v. Overhead Doors of Albany, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01336
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith and Michael Smith
Defendant:
Overhead Doors of Albany, Inc., David Ripley and Ken Harrington
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Guilbaud et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv04357
Plaintiff:
Olivia Guilbaud, Marques Lilly, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Sprint Nextel Corporation and Sprint/United Management Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. SCHWANS HOME SERVICE INC
as 2:2013cv00231
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
SCHWANS HOME SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
