Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Talley v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shekena Talley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Moeller v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tom Moeller
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Arnold v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bryan Arnold
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Laws v. Wal-Mart
as 3:2023cv01926
Plaintiff:
Tyshon D. Laws
Defendant:
Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
ADAMS v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 0:2023cv60678
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN E ADAMS
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. a Delaware corporation doing business as Sams Club
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Simmons et al v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maria Simmons, Thanh Le, Timothy Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Yslas v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01880
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Yslas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club and Sam's Club
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nelson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
MILLER v. WALMART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2020cv00168
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. and WALMART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
LESLIE MILLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jaffarzad v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02410
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Farid John Jaffarzad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
