Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McNamara v. Your Fare, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00140
Defendant:
Your Fare, Inc. and Christopher Monk
Plaintiff:
Meghan McNamara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Coultrip et al v. Pfizer, Inc
as 1:2006cv09952
Plaintiff:
Heather Pfleegor, Valerie Elser-Stone, Lauren Brown and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Juan Jesus Baldivia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Monk v. Prestige Millwork, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
Michael Monk
Defendant:
Prestige Millwork, Inc. and Matt Wickersham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MONK v. POLY-COR MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
JERRY MONK
Defendant:
POLY-COR MANAGEMENT, INC., POLY-COR ENTERPRISES MANAGEMENT, INC., POLY-COR ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Monk v. Elite Limousine Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01880
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Monk
Defendant:
Elite Limousine Service, Inc. , Ronald Montross and Daniel Gardella
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Velasquez v. Hairy Monk, Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00464
Plaintiff:
Macario Velasquez
Defendant:
Hairy Monk, Corp. and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Monk v. TEPCO - Team Enterprise Project Controls Organization, LLC
as 4:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Williams Monk
Defendant:
TEPCO - Team Enterprise Project Controls Organization, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez v. Hairy Monk, Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv04196
Plaintiff:
Pablo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Hairy Monk, Corp. and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morales v. Hairy Monk Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv02091
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Morales
Defendant:
Hairy Monk Corp., John Hayes and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martinez et al v. Hairy Monk, Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv07842
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Defendant:
Hairy Monk, Corp. and John Cavanagh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
