Cases 11 - 20 of 69
David Furmanski v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Davis Furmanski
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jones v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Monica Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Whitted v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01939
Plaintiff:
Terry Whitted
Defendant:
Wal Mart Associates Inc and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Sheehan v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sheehan
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Thomas v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc.
as 8:2022cv02382
Plaintiff:
Jamella Thomas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
AMANIERA v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 9:2021cv82046
Plaintiff:
MARIE AMANIERA
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Sartain v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 1:2021cv04192
Plaintiff:
Raven Sartain
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cloer v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Amy Cloer
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Muldrow v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2021cv04275
Plaintiff:
Desiree Muldrow
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hughes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01376
Plaintiff:
Larry Hughes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
