Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mendoza v. DeJoy
as 1:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Mendoza
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY POSTMASTER GENERAL and Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pena v. PostMaster General et al.,
as 3:2018cv03931
Plaintiff:
Israel Pena
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, PostMaster General and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Kedric Mitchell v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 17-2349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEDRIC MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Shenika Fuller v. Patrick Donahoe
as 15-10334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHENIKA N. FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, United States Postal Service Postmaster General
Booker v. United States Postal Office, Postmaster General et al
as 4:2015cv10631
Plaintiff:
Mae A Booker
Defendant:
United States Postal Office, Postmaster General and United States Postal Service
Mitchell v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2014cv13916
Plaintiff:
Kedric Mitchell
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Postmaster General for the United States
Dungan v. Donahoe
as 14-2781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan G. Dungan
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Duberry v. Postmaster General United States Postal Service
as 1:2013cv22496
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Duberry
Defendant:
Postmaster General United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Moore v. Postmaster General
as 1:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Christine Moore
Defendant:
Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Angie Morgan v. John Potter, Postmaster Gen
as 11-60101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGIE MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
