Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension, Health and Welfare, Deferred Savings, Apprenticeship, Scholarship, and Joint Cooperation Trust Funds v. M.J. Anderson Interiors, Inc.
as 1:2009cv05432
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension, Health and Welfare, Deferred Savings, Apprenticeship, Scholarship, and Joint Cooperation Trust Funds, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension, Health and Welfare, Deferred Savings, Apprenticeship, Scholarship, and Joint Cooperation Trust Funds and Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension, Health and Welfare, Deferred Savings, Apprenticeship, Scholarship, and Joint Cooperation Trust Funds
Defendant: M.J. Anderson Interiors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type: Labor None
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers et al v. M. J. Raleigh Truckin, Inc.
as 0:2009cv00923
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers, Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers, Local #49 International Union Of Operating Engineers and Associated General Contractors of Minnesota Apprenticeship and Training Program and their Trustees and others
Defendant: M.J. Raleigh Truckin', Inc. and Michael S. Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Seipel et al v. M.J. Ryan Construction Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv05106
Plaintiff: Jeff Seipel, Tom Vevea, James Brady and others
Defendant: M.J. Ryan Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY WELFARE FUND, INC. - PENSION FUND v. M.J. PAQUET INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02810
Plaintiff: TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY WELFARE FUND, INC. - PENSION FUND
Defendant: M.J. PAQUET INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers et al v. M.J. Ryan Construction Company
as 0:2008cv01048
Plaintiff: Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers, Operating Engineers Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund and Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineering and Participating Employers, Local #49 International Union Of Operating Engineers and Associated General Contractors of Minnesota Apprenticeship and Training Program and their Trustees and others
Defendant: M.J. Ryan Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees for the Upper Peninsula Plumbers' and Pipefitters' Health Care Fund et al v. M.J. Berger, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01188
Plaintiff: Trustees for the Upper Peninsula Plumbers' and Pipefitters' Health Care Fund, Trustees for the Upper Peninsula Plumbers' and Pipefitters' Pension Fund, Trustees for the Upper Peninsula Plumbers' and Pipefitters' Educational Fund and others
Defendant: M.J. Berger, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Local 36 Welfare Fund et al v. M.J. Mechanical, LLC et al
as 4:2007cv01332
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Sheet Metal Local 36 Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sheet Metal Local 36 Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sheet Metal Local 36 Pension Fund and others
Defendant: M.J. Mechanical, LLC and Myron Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?