Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ryan v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2020cv00556
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company and The Proctor & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company
Plaintiff:
Robert Ryan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hounihan v. Procter & Gamble Disability Committee, The et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charlie Craig Hounihan
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Disability Committee, The and Procter & Gamble Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hounihan v. Procter & Gamble Disability Committee, The et al
as 4:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
Charlie Craig Hounihan
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Disability Committee, The and Procter & Gamble Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Prince v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Mark J Prince
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Intergrated Organization Design Voluntary Separation Plan The Procter & Gamble Company and Procter & Gamble Health & Welfare Committee The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA, et al v. United Healthcare of Arizona,, et al
as 12-17604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPINEDEX PHYSICAL THERAPY USA INCORPORATED, CLAUDE ARAGON, JACK ADAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED HEALTHCARE OF ARIZONA, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA Inc v. United Healthcare of Arizona, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00457
Plaintiff:
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA Inc and Spinedex Physical Therapy USA Inc
Defendant:
United Healthcare of Arizona, Inc., Ingenix Inc, UnitedHealth Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Steven Menz v. Procter & Gamble Health Care P, et al
as 07-1997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven Menz
Defendant - Appellee:
Procter & Gamble Health Care Plan, Procter & Gamble Company, The, Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, The and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
