Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd. v. GW Trading LLC et al
as 5:2013cv01079
Defendant:
Amaar Habib Inc., Amin Habib Inc., Ariahabib Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rovio Entertainment, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kessler v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2013cv05084
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Kessler
Defendant:
Harry Bauer Rodrigues , Prometheus Global Media LLC , Rolling Stone LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mathew v. The Walt Disney Company et al
as 6:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Royce Mathew
Defendant:
The Walt Disney Company, Ted Elliott, Terry Rossio and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Action Direct Marketing, Inc. v. METX, LLC et al
as 6:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Action Direct Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick J. Curry, DOES 1-50 Inclusive, MEFL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DMN Films, LLC v. DOES 1-50
as 1:2013cv02360
Plaintiff:
DMN Films, LLC
Defendant:
DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
R&D Film 1, LLC v. Does 1-50
as 1:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
R&D Film 1, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
R & D Film 1 LLC v. Does 1-50
as 2:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
R & D Film 1 LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SIEMENS PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, INC. v. DOES 1-50
as 2:2012cv06795
Plaintiff:
SIEMENS PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, INC.
Defendant:
DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
West Coast Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-50
as 4:2012cv01679
Plaintiff:
West Coast Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-50
as 2:2012cv05815
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
