Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Todd Michael Schultz v. Michael C. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv10759
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Schultz
Defendant:
Michael C Thompson, Gregory R. Holmes and YouTube LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bradley et al v. Schuster et al
as 1:2021cv02752
Plaintiff:
Tabari-Dominique Bradley, Tiffany-Nicole Bradley and Michael-Alexander Walker
Defendant:
Stephen J Schuster, Rebecca Keaton and Joyette M Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
King-Holmes v. Endeavor Business Media, LLC
as 3:2021cv00286
Defendant:
Endeavor Business Media, LLC
Plaintiff:
James King-Holmes
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Angelo Reno v. Scott Hubbell et al
as 2:2020cv11756
Defendant:
Baywatch Production Company, Inc., Henry Holmes, Does 1-100 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Reno
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Holmes v. Cummins
as 1:2017cv03042
Plaintiff:
Clarence Holmes
Defendant:
William Cummins
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Archer v. Holmes et al
as 1:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Archer
Defendant:
London Holmes, 300 Entertainment LLC, BMG Gold Songs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Texas Association of Realtors Inc v. AutoRealty LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Texas Association of Realtors Inc
Defendant:
AutoRealty LLC, Paul David Whatley, Misty Michelle Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
LHF Productions Inc v. Doe 1, et al
as 17-35242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LHF PRODUCTIONS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
DOE 1, PATRICIA HOLMES, agent of Doe 5, SCOTT SWIBERG, agent of Doe 14 and others
Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Phoenix Publishing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv09386
Defendant:
Backseatcuddler.com, Does, Joshua Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Mavrix Photo, Inc.
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. Nick Holmes et al
as 2:2013cv00867
Defendant:
Does, Nick Holmes and Samir Sahyoun
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
