Cases 1 - 8 of 8
VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. SOVEREIGN SWEETS et al
as 2:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN SWEETS, VINCENT WATSON, ANDRE DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Danny Valentine Shabazz v. Sovereign Sweets, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
SOVEREIGN SWEETS, VINCENT WATSON, ANDRE DICKENS and others
SHABAZZ v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
PIERRE THOMAS, KEVIN COACH K LEE, KELAN WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Brand Q, Inc. v. Chris K. Lee Fashion, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09152
Plaintiff:
Brand Q, Inc.
Defendant:
Chris K. Lee Fashion, LLC doing business as Tievest.com doing business as Vesuvio Napoli, Does 1-10, Inclusive and Chris K. Lee Fashion, LLC individually doing business as Tievest.com doing business as Vesuvio Napoli
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Shabazz v. Watson et al
as 1:2023cv04048
Plaintiff:
Danny Amen Valentine Shabazz
Defendant:
Sovereign Sweets Vincent Watson, Kelan Watson, Brian Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2023cv01757
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
ELIZABETH MATTHEWS, LUCIAN GRAINGE, ASCAP AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS AND AUTHORS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Lee v. Hypebeast, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01091
Plaintiff:
Derrick K. Lee
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Hypebeast, Inc., 101 Media Lab Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Microsoft Corporation v. #9 Software, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
#9 Software, Inc., Shahan K. Lee and Siew Pui Singleton
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
