Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Richard Hofman v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, et al
as 23-55494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD ALAN HOFMAN and RICHARD HOFMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES LLC, Previously sued as Fidelity Investment Financial Services Corporation Erroneously Sued As Fidelity Investment Financial Services Corporation, FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC., DEPOSITORY TRUST AND CLEARING CORPORATION and others
Gray v. Fidelity Investment
as 22-565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michele Gray
Defendant / Appellee:
Fidelity Investments
Gray v. Fidelity Investment
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michele Gray
Defendant:
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC and Fidelity Investment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Lauring et al v. Weiss et al
as 4:2016cv40015
Plaintiff:
Lauring, John P. Lauring, Lauring Charitable Foundation and others
Defendant:
Weiss, Lee D. Weiss, Family Endowment Partners, LP and others
Interested Party:
David E. Bower
Trustee:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Cowgill et al
as 2:2014cv00396
Defendant:
Douglas E. Cowgill and Professional Investment Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Intervenor:
Midwest Physician Anesthesia Services, Inc.
Claimant:
Gregory Krivchenia, II
Receiver:
Michael P O'Grady
Garnishee:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rivera v. Fidelity Investments et al
as 1:2012cv05324
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Rivera
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC and NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Zametkin v. Fidelity Management & Research Company et al
as 1:2008cv10960
Defendant:
Fidelity Management & Research Company, Fidelity Investments, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Zametkin and Alan Zametkin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
