Cases 11 - 20 of 1,344
FAIRFIELD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00932
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DIANE FAIRFIELD
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Penfield v. Colvin
as 13-2225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sharon Penfield
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, in place of Michael Astrue
Harris v. Astrue
as 13-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Astrue, Commisioner of Social Security
Ehrhart v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00360
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kristina Danielle Ehrhart
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Dye v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00220
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Dye
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Wyre v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00201
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Troy Patrick Wyre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Banks v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00189
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
John Darrel Banks
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00175
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lucretia Michelle Robinson
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Wleczyk v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv00121
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Wleczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
CELENTO v. ASTRUE
as 2:2013cv00269
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CELENTO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
