Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Andrus v. Commission of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Troy K Andrus
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GINTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03504
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GINTER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and COMMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Empey v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Lance Paul Empey
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BARRY v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
COREY JAMES BARRY
Defendant:
COMMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mahalovich v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv01426
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Paul Mahalovich
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Smith v. Commission Of Social Security
as 1:2019cv06480
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
Commission Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Mendick v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2018cv00353
Plaintiff:
Neal Scott Mendick
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reeves v. Commission of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Reeves
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Amy Kelly v. Michael Astrue
as 10-36147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMY A KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commission of Social Security
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00405
Plaintiff:
William D Baker
Defendant:
Commission of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
