Supplemental Security Income Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,861
Albert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Danielle E Albert
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kelley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00555
Plaintiff: Christine E. Kelley
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Suri v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02541
Plaintiff: Dustin E. Suri
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dash v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff: Rebekah E. Dash
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nero v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01154
Plaintiff: Michaek E Nero
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NERO v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01156
Plaintiff: MICHAEL E NERO
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Weidenburner v. Social Security
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Jason E. Weidenburner
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hyden-Subichin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00532
Plaintiff: Joan E. Hyden-Subichin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STEPHENSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. STEPHENSON
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hickman v. Preston et al
as 3:2024cv01374
Plaintiff: Jabar Hickman
Defendant: Kathryn Preston, Wanda C. E. Beanmon and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?