Cases 31 - 40 of 48
DUNAWAY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00419
Defendant:
COMM'R SOC. SEC NANCY A. BERRYHILL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
NICKLOS D. DUNAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fratis v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin.
as 3:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin.
Plaintiff:
David Charles Fratis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michaelson v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin.
as 1:2018cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin.
Plaintiff:
Teresa M. Michaelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv03717
Plaintiff:
CORY W. SMITH
Defendant:
COMM'R SOC. SEC NANCY A. BERRYHILL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MEREDITH v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv03653
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MEREDITH and COMM'R SOC. SEC NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MCCABE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02879
Plaintiff:
TAMMI R. MCCABE
Defendant:
COMM'R SOC. SEC NANCY A. BERRYHILL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Bonk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01021
Plaintiff:
ALICIA C. BONK
Defendant:
COMM'R SOC. SEC Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Christensen v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin.
as 3:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Nick J. Christensen, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc. Sec. Admin.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Haas v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00065
Respondent:
Acting Commissioner Commissioner Social Security Administration
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Haas
Interested Party:
Soc Sec Admin SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kuznicki v. Commissioner Soc Sec et al
as 1:2016cv03382
Plaintiff:
David Kuznicki
Defendant:
Commissioner Soc Sec and US Attorney for the Southern District of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
