Cases 101 - 110 of 241,036
S.O. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity et al
as 2:2024cv04998
Plaintiff:
S.O.
Defendant:
MindGeek S.a.r.l. a foreign entity, MG Freesites, Ltd, a foreign entity, MindGeek USA Incorporated, a Delaware corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gabriel Laurant v. Proliance Surgeons, Inc. P.S.
as 2:2024cv05010
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Laurant
Defendant:
Proliance Surgeons, Inc. P.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Office Create Corporation v. Planet Entertainment, LLC et al
as 3:2024mc00073
Plaintiff:
Office Create Corporation
Defendant:
Planet Entertainment, LLC and Steve Grossman
Foster v. Kendall Credit and Business Service Inc
as 1:2024cv22287
Plaintiff:
Keri Foster
Defendant:
Kendall Credit and Business Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Arjoon et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 9:2024cv80742
Plaintiff:
Emily Arjoon, Sally Arjoon and Tyler Arjoon
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
United States of America v. Top Tier Remodeling Corporation
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Top Tier Remodeling Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Watson et al v. Thor Motor Coach
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Watson and Mary E. Watson
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
In Re Attorney Admission for Blaine Franklin Burgess
as 5:2024aa00065
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
New S.S. Group, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv11542
Plaintiff:
New S.S. Group, Inc. a Massachusetts Corporation doing business as S S Market #1, Shilpi Rani Devi and Sumon Kumar Nath
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
