Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 131
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Homestead Properties, LP et al
as 2:2009mc51368
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Homestead Properties, LP, Homestead Limited, LLC, California Wealth Managment Group and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Salter et al v. Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.,
as 4:2009cv02097
Plaintiff: Heath Salter, Heath Salter, Heath Salter and others
Defendant: Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HEATH v. BONDED CREDIT BUREAU, INC
as 3:2009cv03185
Plaintiff: SHAUNA HEATH
Defendant: BONDED CREDIT BUREAU, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Leatt Corporation et al v. Innovative Safety Technology, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01301
Plaintiff: Leatt Corporation and Exceed Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Defendant: Innovative Safety Technology, LLC, Kevin Heath Enterprises, Inc., Kevin Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1309
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. MA Dept of Telecommunications, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant: 1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae: PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 09-1041
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
: , , and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Third Party Defendant - Appellant: GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., GLOBAL NAPS NETWORKS, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant: 1120 HANCOCK STREET, INC., FRANK T. GANGI, 321 HEATH STREET REALTY TRUST and others
: , , and others
Heath v. Paramount Lake Eola, L.P.
as 6:2008cv01626
Plaintiff: Robin Heath
Defendant: Paramount Lake Eola, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Heath v. Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
as 3:2008cv01414
Plaintiff: Steven Heath
Defendant: Legal Recovery Law Offices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?