Cases 121 - 130 of 506
Matthew Aquino v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06200
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aquino
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. McClatchy U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2019at00529
Defendant:
McClatchy U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diontai Evans
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Evans v. McClatchy U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2019cv01175
Defendant:
McClatchy U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diontai Evans
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Luis Enrique Perez Borjas v. Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A.
as 2:2019cv05104
Defendant:
Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A.
Plaintiff:
Luis Enrique Perez Borjas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
BENTLEY et al v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2019cv13554
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEGNER, SAM LEE, CHERYL ERVIN and others
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Confidence U.S.A. Inc et al
as 2:2019cv03073
Defendant:
Helen Chian, Confidence U.S.A. Inc and Jim Chao
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Steve Croft et al v. ZF Friedrichshafen AG et al
as 2:2019cv04256
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corp., Honda R&D Co., Ltd., ZF Friedrichshafen AG and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Croft and Judith Servis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Bittlingmeyer v. Holcombe U.S.A., Inc.
as 0:2019cv61113
Defendant:
Holcombe U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carly Bittlingmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Orleans City v. Apache Louisiana Minerals LLC et al
as 2:2019cv08290
Defendant:
Apache Louisiana Minerals LLC, ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP and others
Plaintiff:
New Orleans City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tripp v. Federal Government of the U.S.A. et al
as 4:2019cv04071
Defendant:
Federal Government of the U.S.A. and Matthew W. Thelen
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
