Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara
as 4:2023mc80222
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
McNeal v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Charles McNeal and Charles Freeman McNeal
Defendant:
United States of America and ANgela C. McNeal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
IN RE: NAMESILO, LLC
as 1:2023mc00054
In Re:
NAMESILO, LLC
Interested Party:
CENGAGE LEARNING INC., ELSEVIER INC. and BEDFORD, FREEMAN & WORTH PUBLISHING GROUP, LLC doing business as MACMILLAN LEARNING doing business as MCGRAW-HILL GLOBAL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC doing business as PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
BOBB v. Freeman et al
as 9:2023mc80387
Plaintiff:
Christina Bobb
Defendant:
Ruby Freeman
Respondent:
Wandrea ArShaye Moss
In re: Nestle Waters North America Inc
as 3:2023mc00009
Respondent:
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
Petitioner:
Nestle Waters North America Inc.
Intervenor:
Mark J. Patane, et al.
v. Freeman et al
as 9:2023mc80386
In Re:
Christina Bobb
Respondent:
Ruby Freeman and Wandrea ArShaye Moss
Anderson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Latoya Anderson and Latoya Freeman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC. v. WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
as 2:2023cv00208
Petitioner:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC.
Respondent:
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
ABERNATHY et al v. CARLYLE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03603
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABERNATHY, CEDRICK ARTHUR, LARRY BESS and others
Defendant:
The Carlyle Group, Inc., MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
