Cases 11 - 20 of 35
HARRELL v. RITE AID CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv02960
Plaintiff:
DIONNA HARRELL
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
HARRELL v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv02705
Plaintiff:
DIONNA HARRELL
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
United States of America v. Harrell
as 5:2017cv00196
Defendant:
Katrina Harrell
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HARRELL v. THE LAW OFFICES OF FREDERIC I. WEINBERG et al
as 2:2016cv01355
Plaintiff:
DENISE HARRELL
Defendant:
THE LAW OFFICES OF FREDERIC I. WEINBERG and MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adam et al v. Batiste et al
as 4:2015cv02235
Plaintiff:
David Adam and Benny Holland, Jr
Defendant:
Rodrick Batiste and Tracy Harrell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Harrell v. Vertical Brands Media Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01280
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrell
Defendant:
Vertical Brands Media Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRELL v. EASTWICK COLLEGE AND THE HOHOKUS SCHOOLS et al
as 2:2014cv02373
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARRELL
Defendant:
EASTWICK COLLEGE AND THE HOHOKUS SCHOOLS and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRELL v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2013cv07638
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HARRELL
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Smith, et al. v. Ruan Logistics Corporation, et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Defendant:
Ruan Logistics Corporation and Jim Williams
Plaintiff:
James Steven Smith , Jeremy Jackson Dotson , Aron K Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GILES, ARTIS HOUSTON, HORACE COPELAND and others
Defendant:
NFL PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL FILMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
