Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Terri Alves v. Impact Marketing Specialists, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv02812
Plaintiff:
Terri Alves
Defendant:
Does and Impact Marketing Specialists, Inc.
Born v. RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS SPECIALIST, INC.
as 0:2016cv61138
Plaintiff:
Susan M. Born
Defendant:
RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS SPECIALIST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zori v. Enterprise Holdings, LLC. et al
as 3:2016cv01108
Plaintiff:
Wisam Zori
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, LLC., Metropolitan Accounts Receivable Specialists, Inc., Sixt Rent A Car, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Spinner v. Paul J. Hooten & Associates PLLC et al
as 2:2016cv02215
Defendant:
Alliance Coding & Consulting Inc., Gloria Brogan, Paul Joseph Hooten and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda E. Spinner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stevenson v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al
as 16-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE W. STEVENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
AMAZON.COM and SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC.
13-50 RIVER ROAD CORP v. ANSAM COMMERCIAL KITCHEN AND VENTILATIONS SPECIALISTS, INC.
as 2:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
13-50 RIVER ROAD CORP
Defendant:
ANSAM COMMERCIAL KITCHEN AND VENTILATIONS SPECIALISTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stevenson v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13505
Plaintiff:
Janice Stevenson
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Security Industry Specialists, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Launius Marketing Specialists, Inc. v. Pepper et al
as 3:2015cv01042
Defendant:
David Pepper and Apex Sales & Marketing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Launius Marketing Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tavia Lawson v. Career Specialists, Inc.
as 2:2014cv07473
Defendant:
Career Specialists, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tavia Lawson
Hartley-Culp v. Receivable Solutions Specialist, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hartley-Culp
Defendant:
Receivable Solutions Specialist, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
