Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Royal v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02248
Plaintiff:
Iris Royal
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reeves v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014at00714
Plaintiff:
Wade Reeves
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reeves v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01502
Plaintiff:
Wade Reeves
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reeves v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014at00702
Plaintiff:
Wade Reeves
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Meadows v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Meadows
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Elliott v. National Enterprise Systems Inc
as 1:2014cv00816
Plaintiff:
Melissa Elliott
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Erice v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 0:2014cv60163
Plaintiff:
Catherine Erice
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Skradski et al v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency et al
as 2:2013cv03620
Plaintiff:
Ann M Skradski , Thomas G Baraniak and Gretchen V Baraniak
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, National Enterprise Systems Inc, NCO Financial Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Esguerra v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02716
Plaintiff:
Arturo Esguerra
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SHEARD v. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv03554
Plaintiff:
FATEEN SHEARD
Defendant:
NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
