Cases 21 - 30 of 137
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2020cv01181
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STEPHEN M. HAHN and others
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN GROUP HOLDINGS LLC and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PUBLIC HEALTH LAW CENTER, PUBLIC CITIZEN, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Brown v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Joshua Omar Brown
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, The General Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stroud et al v. Ali-Bey
as 1:2021cv04494
Plaintiff:
Dawn G. Stoud, Lenoir County Clerk Office, State of North Carolina Municipal Corporation and others
Defendant:
Jamel Ali-Bey Propria persona sui juris ex rel Jamel Divine Ali doing business as JCI Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
State of Texas v. USA
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv04155
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Holdings, LLC, Frontier Communications Corporation, Frontier Communications Intermediate, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, The People of the State of California, State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
State of Maryland, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 20-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
People of the State of California, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elisabeth Devos, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of New York, State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General and others
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01468
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH DEVOS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, AASA, SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT'S ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States Of America v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 1:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
the State of Indiana, the State of Georgia, the State of New Jersey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. and DEF
Intervenor Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Respondent:
Shepherd, Finkelman, Miller & Shah, LLP
Petitioner:
Patrick A. Klingman
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01719
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH D. DEVOS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
