Cases 41 - 50 of 373
Gibson v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 1:2020cv00043
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gibson
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Caiyapat-Green v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 8:2019cv03173
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Plaintiff:
Sayoomporn Caiyapat-Green
Not Classified By Court:
Peter J. Grilli
Stuart Hanneman v. Capital One Bank USA, N.A.
as 2:2019cv10686
Plaintiff:
Stuart Hanneman
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Capital One Bank USA, N.A..
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
MUCH v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv05926
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA) N.A.
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN MUCH
Childers v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 3:2019cv02318
Plaintiff:
Ryan Childers
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
In re: Sean Hartranft v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al
as 19-56390
Defendant / Appellee:
MRC RECEIVABLES, ATLANTIC CREDIT AND FINANCE, INC., GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN HARTRANFT
Plaintiff:
LAVANCHY JOHNSON, RICHARD RAMCHARITAR, RUTH MOYA and others
Patch v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A
as 2:2019cv02273
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A
Plaintiff:
Chris Patch
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Patch v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A
as 2:2019at01059
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A
Plaintiff:
Chris Patch
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Thomas v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 8:2019cv02794
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Plaintiff:
Gina Thomas
Baisden, Michelle et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02970
Defendant:
Capital One N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation and Capital One Bank (USA)
Plaintiff:
Scott Rossi, Patricia Murphy, Natalie Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
