Cases 71 - 80 of 254
Dwight Sterling v. Larry Minasian
as 18-55834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT D. STERLING
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY MINASIAN, Lt. Col., Erroneously Sued As David Minasian
Laurentano v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Sandra Laurentano
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
David Randolph Scott v. Citizen Watch Company of America, Inc. et al
as 5:2018mc80081
Defendant:
Does 1 through 99, inclusive, Citizen Watch Company of America, Inc., Sterling Jewelers Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Randolph Scott
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company v. Hunter
as 2:2018cv11537
Defendant:
Charles R. Hunter
Plaintiff:
Sterling Mortgage and Investment Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Cooper v. Sterling Jewelers Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01158
Plaintiff:
Kike Cooper
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Genesis Financial Solutions
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Serino v. Premier Bankcard
as 3:2018cv00608
Plaintiff:
Sterling Serino
Defendant:
Premier Bankcard
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.
as 8:2018cv01092
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc. and Genesis FS Card Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Stephens v. Sterling Infosystems Inc et al
as 4:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Donald Stephens
Defendant:
Sterling Infosystems Inc and Sterling Infosystems - Ohio Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MITCHELL v. STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2018cv01038
Plaintiff:
MARVIN MITCHELL
Defendant:
STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Andrews v. Sterling Infosystems, Inc.
as 7:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
Deloris Andrews
Defendant:
Sterling Infosystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
