Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Morgenthaler v. Chelsea City Counsel et al
as 2:2023cv12151
Plaintiff:
Gaye Morgenthaler
Defendant:
Chelsea City Counsel, Jane Pacheco, Mariah Fink and others
Brooks et al v. Branham et al
as 6:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Amber Brooks, Courtney Derr, Richard Lawhorn and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Branham, Adrian Compton and Amber Fink
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Fink v. Kirchner et al
as 2:2020cv08938
Defendant:
J. Philip Kirchner and FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. FINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fink v. Kirchner et al
as 1:2020cv05128
Defendant:
J. Philip Kirchner and Flaster/Greenberg P.C.
Plaintiff:
John W. Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Klein v. Finkes
as 2:2019cv00761
Defendant:
Reinhold J. Finkes
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Johnson v. Finke
as 3:2019mc80200
Respondent:
Chad Finke
Petitioner:
Romin Kenneth Johnson Chad Estate
In the Matter of the Application of Fink & Carney Reporting and Video Services
as 1:2018cv02642
Defendant:
the Application of Fink & Carney Reporting and Video Services and University of Maryland St. Joseph's Medical Center Foundation, Inc.
Petitioner:
In the Matter of the Application of Fink & Carney Reporting and Video Services
Plaintiff:
Crystal Helbig
Fink v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07045
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Timepayment Corp
Plaintiff:
Marvin T. Fink
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fink v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 2:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fink
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
