Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harwood v. Nationwide Credit, Inc et al
as 0:2020cv60804
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Nationwide Credit, Inc
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Harwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson et al v. First Choice Payment Solutions GP
as 2:2019cv00742
Plaintiff:
Steve Anderson, Lori Evers, William Boyce and others
Defendant:
First Choice Payment Solutions G.P., d/b/a Sekure Merchant Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Abrahams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11519
Plaintiff:
Peter Cullen, Duwayne Tinsley, Joseph Cerrato and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
In the Matter of Sterling Voss Harwood - #194746
as 3:2016mc80208
Respondent:
Sterling Voss Harwood
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Harwood v. Disney et al
as 1:2015cv02399
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brent Harwood
Defendant:
Darren Earl Disney and Bay Area Receivables, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Harwood v. Credit Collection Services
as 6:2015cv01270
Defendant:
Credit Collection Services
Plaintiff:
Theresa Harwood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
National Response Corporation v. A2Z Environmental Group, LLC
as 1:2012cv00134
Petitioner:
National Response Corporation
Respondent:
A2Z Environmental Group, LLC
Arbitrator:
David W. Martowski, Bambi W. Stevens, Esq. and Jeremy J.O. Harwood
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Nickel v. Hampson et al
as 4:2009cv06104
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Nickel and Jeremy Nickel
Defendant:
Dirk Hampson, Larry S. Maguire, Laura Harwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
United States v. Harwood
as 2:2008at00060
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
David M. Harwood
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. Harwood
as 2:2008mc00013
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
David M. Harwood
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
