Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Narodowa v. Athlete Benefits Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024mi00084
Defendant:
Athlete Benefits Group, LLC and Lamar D. William
Plaintiff:
Polska Fundacja Narodowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Marshall
as 2:2024mc50005
Not Yet Classified:
Darrell Lamar Marshall
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
PEARSON v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2023cv03597
Plaintiff:
LAMAR R. PEARSON, SR.
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, MENDOHLSON and DC RETIREMENT BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Knights Templar Commandery et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Defendant:
Fredro Starr, Knights Tempar Commandery Zone 12, Southgate, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carney v. Paxton et al
as 4:2023cv03957
Plaintiff:
Shirley Mae Carney
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Anna Vaso-Garcoa, Lina Maria Hidalgo and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Anthony v. Farmer et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar Anthony
Defendant:
Daniel Farmer, Remer Cobb and Charles Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ridgeway v. Ancestry.com Operations, Inc
as 7:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Willis Lamar Ridgeway
Defendant:
Ancestry.com Operations, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
ESTATE OF WANDA LORRAINE KELLY JOHNSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WANDA LORRAINE KELLY JOHNSON, ARI SIMONE FOSTER, ESTATE OF ETHELEAN KING KELLY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
United States of America v. Wicker II
as 1:2023mc51134
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Colburn Lamar Wicker II
Interested Party:
Kayla L. Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
