Cases 1 - 10 of 438
Gardner v. Long
as 24-4063
Plaintiff:
EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant:
WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Parbhudial v. Long Island Railroad
as 1:2024cv03677
Plaintiff:
Satram Parbhudial
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
MGM Grand Hotel V. Kevin Chang Sheng Long
as 2:2024cv03252
Plaintiff:
MGM Grand Hotel
Defendant:
Kevin Chang Sheng Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MGM Grand Hotel V. Kevin Chang Sheng Long
as 2:2024mc00050
Plaintiff:
MGM Grand Hotel
Defendant:
Kevin Chang Sheng Long
Long v. Mercedes-Benz USA L L C
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Robert Long
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz U S A L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gardner v. Long
as 24-4020
Plaintiff:
EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant:
WENDI LONG, in Her Official Capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Long Grove Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 1:2024cv10444
Plaintiff:
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Defendant:
Long Grove Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Eric Martin v. Long, et al
as 24-1026
Plaintiff:
ERIC MARTIN
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER LONG, Inkster, MI Police Department, JOHN DOE, 1-3, Inkster Police Officers, WILLIAM RILEY, Chief of Police and others
Neurological Surgery Practice of Long Island, PLLC v. EmblemHealth, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09188
Plaintiff:
Neurological Surgery Practice of Long Island, PLLC
Defendant:
EmblemHealth, Inc., Group Health Incorporated and Health Insurance Plan Of Greater New York
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
