Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Allen v. Brown Advisory, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00680
Plaintiff:
Dr. Joseph P. Allen, IV
Defendant:
Brown Investment, Advisory & Trust Co. and Brown Advisory, LLC
Interested Party:
Flynn Abell & Associates LLC
United States of America v. Santa Barbara Cty. Chapter, Natl Elec. Contractors Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00091
Defendant:
A. F. Duncan, Don Heumphreus, Frank Martin and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
In the Matter of Gregory P. Allen - #098002
as 3:2019mc80115
Respondent:
Gregory P. Allen
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States ex re l. Boggs, et al v. Bright Smile Family Dentistry, et al
as 13-6125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOU BOGGS and KIM BORDEN, United States of America, ex rel
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIGHT SMILE FAMILY DENTISTRY P.L.C., AKA Bright Smile Family Dentistry, AKA Bright Smile Family Dentistry Family & Cosmetic Dentistry, ELI TANIOS JARJOURA, individually and as the owner of Bright Smile, d/b/a Eli Tanios Jarjoura, PC, d/b/a Bright Smile Family Dentistry Family & Cosmetic Dentistry, d/b/a Brite Smile Family Dentistry;, JULIE SPEIGHTS, DDS, d/b/a Julie Speights, P.C., d/b/a Bright Smile Family Dentistry Family & Cosmetic Dentistry, d/b/a Brite Smile Family Dentistry; and others
Allen et al v. Gonda et al
as 4:2010cv02795
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Allen , Lou Ellen Allen and Lori Allen Wallace
Defendant:
Matthew Gonda , Mark Germain, Margaret Chassman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boggs et al v. Bright Smile Family Dentistry PLC et al
as 5:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Lou Boggs and Kim Borden
Defendant:
Bright Smile Family Dentistry PLC , Eli Tanios Jarjoura , Julie Speights DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Nensi Allen v. James P Allen, Sr
as 5:2008cv12815
Plaintiff:
Nensi Allen
Defendant:
James P Allen, Jr
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
