Cases 1 - 10 of 21
KODENKANDETH v. UPMC HEALTH PLAN, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02049
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KODENKANDETH and John F Kodenkandeth
Defendant:
UPMC HEALTH PLAN, INC. doing business as UPMC FOR LIFE, UPM CORPORATE HOLDING CO., UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Texas Children's Hospital, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 18-5238
Defendant / Appellant:
Alex Michael Azar, II, in his official capacity, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Seema Verma, in her official capacity, Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Texas Children's Hospital and Seattle Children's Hospital
Wetterman v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2018cv00085
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services and Chair, Department of Health and Human Services Appeals Board
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Wetterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Depomed Inc. v. HHS, et al
as 14-5271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Depomed Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food & Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Food and Drug Administration and others
Steven Hotze, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, et al
as 14-20039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN F. HOTZE, M.D. and BRAIDWOOD MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and JACOB J. LEW, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Kathleen Sebelius v. Uplift Medical, P.C.
as 12-2112
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellant:
UPLIFT MEDICAL, P.C., d/b/a Cignet Health Center, d/b/a Cignet Health Plan, d/b/a Cignet Healthcare, An unincorporated Maryland business association, DANIEL AUSTIN, in his joint and individual capacity as the co-owner and de facto partner of the Forfeited Professional Corporation, Uplift Medical, P.C. and CYNTHIA AUSTIN, in her joint and individual capacity as the co-owner and de facto partner of the Forfeited Professional Corporation, Uplift Medical, P.C.
Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-60333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT GULFPORT, FORREST GENERAL HOSPITAL, SOUTHWEST MISSISSIPPI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and DONALD BERWICK, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Methane Awareness, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-30812
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AKZO NOBEL INC, GENERAL CHEMICAL CORP, MISSISSIPPI LIME MANAGEMENT CO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JOHN HOWARD, Director, National Institute for Occupatinal Safety and Health and others
Coalition for Mecury Free Drug v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-5035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Coalition for Mecury Free Drugs, (CoMeD, Inc) a non-profit organization, Lisa Sykes, Mark R. Geier, M.D., Ph.D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Andrew C. von Eschenbach, as Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration, Kathleen Sebelius and others
Michael Friedman, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-5028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Friedman, Paul D. Goldenheim and Howard R. Udell
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services and Daniel R. Levinson, in his official capacity as Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
