Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Assoc. for Govt. Acc., et al v. Steve Simon, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
Association for Government Accountability, Mark Koran, Senator, Calvin Bahr, Senator and others
Defendant:
Steve Simon, individually and in his official capacity as Minnesota Secretary of State, or his successor and David Maeda, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Elections for State of Minnesota, or his successor
Appellant:
Wisconsin Voter Alliance
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Stratfs, LLC (f/k/a Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC), et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Strategic Financial Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner:
Fidelis Legal Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6102 Telemarketing rules
Yorktallman v. Trustee, et alia, of Tamara Renee Yorktallman et al
as 0:2023cv03303
Plaintiff:
Tamara Renee Yorktallman
Defendant:
Trustee, et alia, of Tamara Renee Yorktallman, State of Minnesota, The, Molly Mulcahy Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, et al v. Kaine Wen, et al
as 23-55700
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, STATE OF MINNESOTA, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KAINE WEN, in his individual capacity and as trustee of the Kaine Wen 2017 Trust, AKA Kaine Wen Dai, AKA Wen Ting Dai, AKA Wenting Kaine Dai
Defendant:
CONSUMER ADVOCACY CENTER, INC., DBA Premier Student Loan Center, TRUE COUNT STAFFING, INC., DBA SL Account Management, PRIME CONSULTING, LLC, DBA Financial Preparation Services and others
State of Minnesota v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01946
Petitioner:
Minnesota Department of Human Services
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND CO.
Special Master:
HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Maryland, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 20-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
People of the State of California, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elisabeth Devos, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of New York, State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
