Cases 11 - 20 of 16,530
Abarca v. Houston ISD
as 24-20496
Defendant:
Houston Independent School District
Plaintiff:
Marcela Abarca
Poff v. FDC Houston et al
as 4:2024cv04316
Defendant:
FMC Carswell, United States Marshals, FTC Oklahoma City and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Poff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockwood v. Houston Texas Fire Fighters Federal Credit union, et al.
as 4:2024cv04239
Defendant:
Houston Texas Fire Fighters Federal Credit Union and Experian Credit Solutions
Plaintiff:
ryan lockwood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michon Houston v. Jeff Tanner
as 24-1963
Respondent:
JEFF TANNER, Warden, Macomb Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
MICHON D. HOUSTON
Dubash v. City of Houston
as 24-20485
Defendant:
Robert Douglas, Discovery Green Conservancy, formerly known as Houston Downtown Park Conservancy, City of Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Daraius Dubash and Faraz Harsini
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul D. Beauregard et al v. Scott Arceneaux Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv09259
Interested Party:
Ricky Dunigan, Darnell Carlton, Derrick Dewayne Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Beauregard p/k/a DJ Paul and Jordan Houston p/k/a JUICY J
Defendant:
UMG Recordings Inc, Scott Arceneaux Jr. p/k/a Scrim, G*59 Records Inc. dba G*59 Records LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Joaquin Mfg. Corp. v. Action Heavy Haul et al
as 1:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Mfg. Corp.
Defendant:
Action Heavy Haul and Henderson Heavy Haul Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
