Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Rocky Mountain Wild et al. v. Neil Kornze et al.
as 1:2013cv01988
Plaintiff:
Grand Canyon Trust , Center for Biological Diversity , Rocky Mountain Wild and others
Defendant:
Neil Kornze and U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Shores of Panama, LLC et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05147
Plaintiff:
Shores of Panama, LLC , Arthur Darmanin , Neil Cresswell and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , BP America Production Company , BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Environmental Protection Information Center v. Ayers et al
as 1:2013cv00656
Plaintiff:
Environmental Protection Information Center
Defendant:
Jerry Ayers, Stafford Lehr , Charlton H. Bonham and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Hayes et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Peter Hayes , Thi-Ly Downing-Hays , George Eugene Barton and others
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company and PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY et al v. BROMWICH et al
as 1:2010cv01067
Defendant:
BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL R. BROMWICH, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR and others
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, CETACEAN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, LOWER LAGUNA MADRE FOUNDATION and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CAPE WIND ASSOCIATES, LLC
Petitioner:
CONSERVATION LAW CENTER
Amicus Curiae:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, MASS AUDUBON and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND et al v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2010cv01079
Plaintiff:
ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND , RON BORJESON , JEFF GOOD and others
Defendant:
KENNETH SALAZAR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MICHAEL R. BROMWICH and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
The State of New York et al v. Seneca Foods Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv00032
Plaintiff:
The State of New York and The County of Yates
Defendant:
Seneca Foods Corp., Coach & Equipment Manufacturing Corp., Ferro Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Weaver's Cove Energy, LLC v. Rhode Island Coastal Resources, et al
as 08-2440
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WEAVER'S COVE
Defendant - Appellant:
RI COASTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL, MICHAEL M TIKOIAN, in his capacity as Chairman of the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council, PAUL E. LEMONT, in his capacity as Vice Chairman of the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and FALL RIVER, MA
Attorney General for Oklahoma, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 08-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. W.A. Drew Edmondson, in his capacity as Attorney General, FDBA W.A. Drew Edmondson and OFFICE OF THE OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. C. Miles Tolbert in his capacity as the Trustee for Natural Resources for the State of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee:
CARGILL TURKEY PRODUCTION, LLC, CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CARGILL, INC. and others
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant:
TAHLEQUAH LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
RANDY ALLEN, BIG JOHN'S, CHICKEN CREEK VILLAGE STORE and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
JOHN E. ADAIR, JOHN W. ADAIR, VIRGINIA W. ADAIR and others
Third Party Defendant, Counter Claimant:
CITY OF WATTS
Intervenor:
ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and STATE OF ARKANSAS
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Movant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DAIRYMEN and others
UTLEY et al v. BOMBAR et al
as 1:2008cv01319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT UTLEY, JIM COURT, JEROME A. GREENE and others
Defendant:
MARY A. BOMBAR and NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
