Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
City of Torrance v. Hi-Shear Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv07732
Defendant: Hi-Shear Corporation and Hi-Shear Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as LISI Aerospace
Plaintiff: City of Torrance
3Rd Party Defendant: Pat Simmons Golf Company, EFCO, Inc a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as Erie Press Systems, Craig Frudenfeld and others
Cross Defendant: Magellan, Middleton, Inc, Karla Frudenfeld, Wendi Frudenfeld and others
Counter Defendant: Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. and Robinson Helicopter Company, Incorporated
Counter Claimant: Esterline Technologies Corporation, Recreational Vans, Inc, Lyman E Eddy Company and others
Cross Claimant: DASCO Engineering Corporation
Intervenor: Federal Insurance Company and Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al v. FWS, et al
as 23-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of Minnesota Scientific and Natural Areas
Defendant / Appellant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
Trex Properties LLC v. Able Electropolishing Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04159
Defendant: Revcor, Inc., Fabricated Metals Co., Lipke-Kentex Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Trex Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. et al v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00770
Defendant: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and MARTHA WILLIAMS
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA SCIENTIFIC AND NATURAL AREAS and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, L.L.C et al
as 2:2020cv00135
Defendant: Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C., SANDVIK, INC. and FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, L.L.C
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
The State of New York et al v. Town of Clarkstown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00293
Defendant: Metal Improvement Co. LLC, Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Pearson Education, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: The State of New York and Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Pfizer Inc., Clarkstown Landfill Joint Defense Group, Allied Waste North America Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Marangi Bros., Inc. and Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: AM Cosmetics Corp., Markwins International Corp., Aalborg Instruments & Controls, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Rhode Island v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Defendant: ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Plaintiff: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
State of Rhode Island v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00667
Defendant: ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Plaintiff: State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00666
Plaintiff: State of Rhode Island
Defendant: ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
United States of America v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00665
Defendant: ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?