Arbitration Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McDonough v. Bidwill et al
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff: Terence William McDonough
Defendant: Michael J Bidwill and Arizona Cardinals Football Club LLC doing business as Arizona Cardinals
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 3:2022cv04516
Petitioner: LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FRIEDMAN P.C.
Respondent: CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Chatham County Hospital Authority, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019op45725
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Chatham County Hospital Authority, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chatham County Hospital Authority, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00159
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Chatham County Hospital Authority, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 1:2019cv12185
Petitioner: ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FRIEDMAN PC and LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS
Respondent: CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Chatham County Hospital Authority, Georgia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00086
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff: Chatham County Hospital Authority, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 1:2019cv09918
Petitioner: LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FREIDMAN, P.C.
Respondent: CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENISON FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 1:2019cv09263
Petitioner: LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENISON FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
Respondent: CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 1:2019cv08848
Petitioner: LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLIENBAUM & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
Respondent: CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 1:2019cv01034
Petitioner: LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172, ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FREIDMAN, P.C. and LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS
Respondent: CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?