Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Mulgrew et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MULGREW, AFL-CIO, Vito J. Fossella and others
Defendant: United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State of Texas v. Biden
as 23-40671
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, State of Mississippi and State of Louisiana
Defendant / Appellant: President Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Department of Labor, Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor and others
Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas, Inc. et al v. Su et al
as 1:2023cv00396
Plaintiff: Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas, Inc. and Associated Builders and Contractors
Defendant: Julie Su, Principal Deputy Adm Jessica Looman, United States Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mack v. USA
as 23-60558
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joy Mack, Others so Affected
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, HHS Office for Human Research Protections, and OHRP Director Dr. Jerry A. Menikoff and others
State of Tennessee v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00384
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Jessica S. Marcella and others
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Miller et al v. The Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff: Dustin Miller and Jessica Miller
Defendant: The Farm Service Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Arnesen et al v. Raimondo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff: George D. Arnesen and Jeffrey Ryan Bradley
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. and William Copeland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Florida Growers Association, Inc. et al v. Su et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00889
Plaintiff: Florida Growers Association, Inc., National Council of Agricultural Employers, Florida Citrus Mutual and others
Defendant: Acting Sec. Labor Julie A. Su, Prin. Dep. Asst. Sec Brent Parton, Admin Empl Train Brian Pasternak and others
Petitioner: James Simpson, Stephanus De Klerk and Farmworker Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee: MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Theresa Sweet, et al v. American National University, et al
as 23-15051
Plaintiff / Appellee: THERESA SWEET, CHENELLE ARCHIBALD, DANIEL DEEGAN and others
Intervenor: AMERICAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC., LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: MIGUEL A. CARDONA, Secretary of the United States Department of Education and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?