Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Concerned Citizens of St Tammany v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2014cv01118
Plaintiff:
Concerned Citizens of St Tammany
Defendant:
Thomas P Bostick, John McHugh, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Minaxi Patel v. John McHugh
as 14-11544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINAXI I. PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army
Lyda Conner v. U.S. Department of the Army, et al
as 14-5355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYDA P. CONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army, THOMAS R. LAMONT, Assistant Secretary of the Army and others
ADAMSKI v. MCHUGH
as 1:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. ADAMSKI
Defendant:
JOHN MCHUGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Cowles v. McHugh
as 3:2013cv01741
Plaintiff:
William B. Cowles
Defendant:
John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Franklin v. McHugh
as 1:2013cv00660
Plaintiff:
Luther Franklin
Defendant:
John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al.
as 2:2013cv00059
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service , United States Department of Commerce , Rebecca M. Blank and others
Plaintiff:
South Yuba River Citizens League and Friends of the River
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Patel v. McHugh
as 4:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Minaxi I. Patel
Defendant:
John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Conner v. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Lyda P. Conner
Defendant:
Department of the Army, john McHugh, Thomas R. Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Conner v. Department of the Army et al
as 5:2012cv00291
Plaintiff:
Lyda P. Conner
Defendant:
Department of the Army, John McHugh, Thomas R. Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
