Cases 11 - 15 of 15
State of California et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv04869
Defendant:
andrew r. wheeler and united states environmental protection agency
Plaintiff:
state of north carolina, state of minnesota, state of maryland and others
Intervenor:
Montana, State of, Arkansas, State of, National Hydropower Association and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Texas, State of West Virginia, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking
as 3:2020cv04636
Defendant:
Andrew R. Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Idaho Rivers United, California Trout, American Whitewater and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Petroleum Institute and National Hydropower Association
Intervenor:
Montana, State of, Mississippi, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Evans v. Louisiana State
as 2:2018cv14178
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Larnell Evans, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Louisiana State v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-30962
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board and the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, RICHARD L. HANSEN, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Commander for the New Orleans District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL C. WEHR, Major, in his official capacity as Commander for the Mississippi Valley Division of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Louisiana State v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2014cv02467
Plaintiff:
Louisiana State
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Richard L Hansen, Michael C Wehr and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
