Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,919
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00691
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS, THE SOCIETY OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF LAKE CHARLES, THE SOCIETY OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF LAFAYETTE and others
Defendant: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and CHARLOTTE BURROWS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al., v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al.
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff: Plano Chamber of Commerce, American Hotel and Lodging Association, Associated Builders and Contractors and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chang v. United States Department of Education We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff: Jerry Chang
Defendant: United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Walmart, Inc. v. Jean King, et al
as 24-11733
Plaintiff: WALMART, INC.
Defendant: JEAN KING, In her official capacity as Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE OF THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER, In her official capacity as Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his Official Capacity as U.S. Attorney General and others
National Parks Conservation Association v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2024cv01434
Plaintiff: National Parks Conservation Association
Defendant: United States Bureau of Land Management, Tracy Stone-Manning and Karen Mouritsen
Intervenor: Eagle Crest Energy Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Yanyou Chen et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv01076
Plaintiff: Yanyou Chen, Jielu Liu and Yihong Liu
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yan Liang v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv01080
Plaintiff: Yan Liang
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ruyan Jia et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv04214
Plaintiff: Ruyan Jia and Jiacheng Jiang
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Carroll Independent School District v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff: Carroll Independent School District
Defendant: United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, Catherine E. Lhamon, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ManhattanLife Insurance and Annuity Company et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: ManhattanLife Insurance and Annuity Company, Paschall and Associates, Inc. and William C. Paschall
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Department of the Treasury, Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?