Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Sears Roebuck Company, et al v. USPS
as 15-5330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sears Roebuck Company, Segerdahl Graphics, Inc. and Aspen Marketing Services, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
Julian Hood, Jr. v. USPS
as 15-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN R. HOOD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
SFFT, LLC v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
SFFT, LLC
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Koch v. Nezelek
as 3:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
Dolores Koch
Defendant:
Donald Nezelek and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ringland v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
Jerome Ringland
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
National Trust for Historic Preservation v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2014cv05179
Defendant:
United States Postal Service , Patrick R. Donahoe , Tom A Samra and others
Plaintiff:
National Trust for Historic Preservation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
City of Berkeley et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2014cv04916
Plaintiff:
City of Berkeley and Mayor and Members of the City Council of the City of Berkeley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service , Patrick R. Donahoe , Tom A Samra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Hood v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2014cv01104
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Hood, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE)
as 2:2014cv04696
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
