Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 195
Stuhr et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03357
Plaintiff: Frederick Stuhr, Sarah Legare Stuhr, Edward Thomas Legare and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District, LTC Andrew Johannes, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arnesen et al v. Raimondo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff: George D. Arnesen and Jeffrey Ryan Bradley
Defendant: Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc. and William Copeland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified: American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor: Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
State of TX v. EPA
as 23-40306
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Okeelanta Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11684
Plaintiff / Appellant: OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11685
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
United States Sugar Corporation, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11683
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, OKEELANTA CORPORATION and SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Phillips, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-4067
Plaintiff / Appellant: MERLIN SCOTT PHILLIPS, VICKIE PARKS, S&V PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SCOTT SPELLMON, JAMES HANDURA and others
KY v. EPA, et al
as 23-5343
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL S. REGAN, Official Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Agency and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER
KY, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-5345
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENTUCKY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF KENTUCKY, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL S. REGAN, Official Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Agency and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?